Physics_Math_Philosophy
Access the community for free or support Physics_Math_Philosophy to interact and to get exclusive content.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
Objective Probabilistic Realism (OPR)

Non-Observer-Dependent Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Summary:

Objective Probabilistic Realism (OPR) is a realist interpretation of quantum mechanics that posits the Universe evolves non-deterministically according to the probabilistic, yet orderly and causal, structure of the wave function, as governed by the Schrödinger equation. In this view, quantum systems, such as the superposition in Schrödinger’s cat, produce definite outcomes (e.g., the cat is either alive or dead) in objective reality, independent of observation or human measurement.

The probabilities reflect the intrinsic non-determinism of nature, where a single initial condition can lead to multiple possible effects, without implying randomness or incomplete knowledge. Unlike the Copenhagen interpretation, OPR rejects observer-dependent collapse, viewing measurement as merely revealing pre-existing outcomes without altering the system’s dynamics. It avoids hidden variables (as in Bohmian mechanics) and the ontological multiplicity of Many Worlds, maintaining that quantum mechanics is a complete description of reality.

By asserting that definite outcomes occur objectively, as evidenced by pre-human events like the Big Bang or plate tectonics, OPR reconciles the probabilistic predictions of quantum theory with a realist ontology, offering a philosophically consistent framework that aligns with empirical data and the causal evolution of the wave function.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Goldie

I have a Cockapoo called Goldie. She is 13, but spry.

00:00:13
Grok and I converse about my multi-Big Bang Theory

The Big Bang is the leading scientific model for the origin of the universe, supported by extensive evidence like the cosmic microwave background radiation, the expansion of the universe, and the abundance of light elements. It suggests that about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe began as an extremely hot, dense state and has been expanding ever since. However, the Big Bang doesn't explain the absolute "origin" of existence itself—more like the start of the universe as we know it. What caused it or what existed "before" (if that concept even applies) remains unknown, as our understanding of physics breaks down at the singularity. Alternative ideas exist, like cyclic models or multiverse theories, but they're speculative and less supported by evidence. Some philosophical or religious perspectives argue for non-physical origins, though those are outside the realm of empirical science. The honest answer is we don't fully know if "all of existence" stems from the Big Bang—it’s the best ...

Artificial Gravity?

At this scale, it is easier to see that the trees are not under the influence of "artificial" gravity. It is real.
🌎🌐
The gravitational field around each blade of grass and tree is the same as the field around each blade of grass and tree on the surface of Earth.

Notice that if you drive on a road perpendicular to the cylinder axis, you will increase gravity driving one way and decrease it driving the other. If you drive opposite to the spin and at the radial speed, your gravitational field turns Minkowskian, and you are in a "free fall" or inertial coordinate system. That is, you and the car become "weightless."

That means this: The value of a gravity field can go from a surface-of-a-planet value to a free-fall value by a coordinate transformation among systems that are moving at a constant velocity with respect to each other.

At any instant of time, a car moving at the radial speed is in a Minkowski field, and a system at rest on the cylinder is in a planet-surface field. A ...

post photo preview
Aja by Steely Dan -- Does It Mean Anything?

"Aja" is the title track of Steely Dan's 1977 album, and its meaning has been a subject of interpretation rather than a straightforward explanation from the band themselves, Walter Becker and Donald Fagen, who were known for their cryptic and layered lyrics. The song doesn’t tell a linear story but evokes a mood and imagery that fans and critics have analyzed over the years.

The word "Aja" is often speculated to refer to a person, place, or concept. One popular theory ties it to the name "Aja," which Becker and Fagen reportedly chose after learning of a Korean woman named Aja who married a friend of theirs. This fits Steely Dan’s tendency to draw inspiration from real-life fragments and transform them into something abstract. The lyrics—"Up on the hill / People never stare / They just don’t care / Chinese music under banyan trees"—suggest an exotic, serene escape, possibly a romanticized or imagined refuge from the complexities of modern life.

Musically and lyrically, "Aja" ...

Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals