Part 2 - Base Reality as Abstract
What I am getting at is that OSS is a completely analyzable and logical CONSTRUCT, but there is no way to picture it.
In this way, what Scott refers to as the real Base Reality can be modeled: By constructs that defy our sensual intuition.
Note that I am not saying particles can be modeled as an open set of points. They are probably not. I am merely showing how a valid abstract mathematical construct can be given a one-to-one relationship with an aspect of the physical world.
Hence, any suggestion that humans are inherently incapable of conceiving the objective world are not using enough of their imagination. People might not have evolved the NEED to grasp the "real" world, but we didn't evolve the "need" for flying cars either.
Proving the Relativistic Energy-Momentum relation, the hard way and the easier way.
This adds the proof for the relativistic mass effects from motion, proving that gravity causes it.
Two reference frames in motions are not symmetrical. A system at rest on the surface of a planet moves faster in time than a moving system. This is not the case using just Special Relativity. This is proven just using the gravitational metric field in General Relativity.
